Why LLM Observability Matters Beyond Application Performance Monitoring

Traditional Application Performance Monitoring (APM) tools are excellent at measuring infrastructure: whether servers are up, APIs are slow, or databases are overloaded. But if your system uses a large language model, APM by itself has blind spots. It may tell you something is failing or slow but not why your model is producing irrelevant responses, hallucinating, or driving up cost. In LLM applications, what matters most is whether the outputs satisfy users, not just whether requests succeed.

LLM observability is the set of tools, data, and practices that fill that gap. It gives insight into model behavior, not just system health.

‍

Key Takeaways

• APM monitors system health: latency, errors, and resource usage. That is necessary but not sufficient for LLM applications.
• LLM observability supplements APM by adding signal types focused on model input/output content, quality, cost, and user satisfaction.
• To build reliable LLM products, you need observability so you can surface silent failures, debug subtle issues, and ensure the model delivers business value.

‍

Pillars of LLM Observability

Here are four core categories of signals that observability in LLM-powered systems should track. Many existing tools or articles treat these as essentials.

1. Prompt and Response Logging
   You need to capture the content of inputs (prompts, context, any retrieved documents) and outputs (responses). Without this, diagnosing why an answer is poor or unexpected is difficult.
2. Quality / Evaluation Metrics
   Automatically and periodically evaluate outputs for criteria such as relevance, factuality (to detect hallucination), and safety. There are many tools to detect and reduce hallucinations, and these metrics help detect degradations or drift even when no error is thrown.
3. Cost / Token Usage
   LLM usage has variable cost: tokens used for input, output, embeddings, inference, etc. Observability should include tracking token counts, which parts of the pipeline consume the most tokens, and where cost spikes occur.
4. Performance (Latency / Throughput)
   Although this overlaps with APM, in LLM systems you often need more detailed breakdowns: time to retrieve, time to generate first token, total generation time, tokens per second, and throughput under load. These help ensure a responsive user experience and pinpoint internal bottlenecks.

‍

Implementing LLM observability requires a unified platform like Traceloop that can manage instrumentation, signal correlation, and provide dashboards and alerts for these new signal types.

‍

Implementing LLM Observability

• Instrumentation: Use tracing or logging frameworks and insert hooks so that each LLM invocation (and related work such as retrieval or embedding) is instrumented.
• Signal correlation: Link together prompts, responses, cost, and performance metrics. For example, connect a slow response to the prompt that triggered it or to the set of documents retrieved.
• Sampling and retention: Capturing every prompt and response in full detail can be expensive. You may need to sample, or retain full traces only for edge cases (for instance, flagged as anomalous or low quality).
• Dashboards and alerts: Visualize metrics across the pillars (quality, cost, latency). Detect anomalies, regressions, or spikes. Set thresholds or patterns that trigger alerts (for example, a drop in relevance scores or a sudden jump in token usage).

FAQ

1. Can I just use my existing APM tool (like Datadog or New Relic) for an LLM application?
   You can and should continue using existing APM tools to monitor the health of your infrastructure, servers, databases, networking, etc. But they are not built to capture or analyze the content of prompts and responses, which is essential for diagnosing LLM-specific issues. LLM observability platforms are designed to fill that gap.
2. What is OpenTelemetry and why is it relevant?
   OpenTelemetry is an open source standard for collecting telemetry data, such as traces, metrics, and logs. Using it helps avoid vendor lock-in and lets you see all your telemetry in a unified view. In LLM observability, you can extend or adapt it to collect prompts, responses, cost metrics, and quality signals, which is explored further in our guide to DIY observability for LLMs with OpenTelemetry.
3. What is the difference between “LLM monitoring” and “LLM observability”?
   Monitoring is about watching for known problems using predefined dashboards (for example, watching a chart of error rate). Observability is about having the data and tools to investigate unknown or unexpected problems. Because LLMs are inherently unpredictable, observability is essential for debugging new and subtle failure modes that monitoring alone cannot capture.
4. How does LLM observability help with cost management?
   By tracking token usage for each prompt and response, an observability system can identify which parts of your application are driving the highest costs. You can detect inefficient prompts, overuse of model power, or abuse, and optimize accordingly to reduce API spending.

Conclusion

In sum, APM remains essential for infrastructure visibility, but for LLM applications it is not enough. To truly understand how your model behaves in real use, you need observability into prompt content, output quality, cost efficiency, and performance. By putting those observability practices in place, you move beyond “it works” toward “it works well, reliably, and in alignment with your goals.

Get started with full LLM observability. Book a demo today.